Verse of the Day

Friday, September 11, 2015

Pastor's Sermon Notes: Five Words You Must Understand (series), Part Twenty-four, “Joy shall be in heaven.” (Luke 15:7)

Sermon Series:
Five Words You Must Understand

1 Corinthians 14:19
Yet in the church I had rather speak
five words with my understanding,
that by my voice I might teach others also,
than ten thousand words in an unknown tongue.

Part Twenty-four: Luke 15:7
“Joy shall be in heaven.”


Introduction:

On the old Daniels and Webster program on ROCK107 we often heard from one Walter Nepasky.  He would begin his commentary in his very recognizable “Coal Cracker” dialect with either, “I'm Walter Nepasky and today I wanna talk about tree tings.”, or “Hi. My name is Walter Nepasky. How ya doin’? Today I want to talk to you about tree tings.”

What if we had a modern Christian radio station —The Rock of Ages 316 — with a program that began, “Hi, I’m Paul of Tarsus, and today I want to talk about five words.”

The Apostle Paul wrote: Yet in the church I had rather speak five words with my understanding,
that by my voice I might teach others also, than ten thousand words in an unknown tongue.[1]

Paul follows up his introduction on The Rock of Ages 316 with his personal example — an extreme preference framed as a mathematical proportion: 5 versus 10,000. This is Paul’s “druthers”!  This is when 5 is better than 10,000!

If Paul were here, and you could pin him down to a literal selection of five words, what do you think he would choose?  “Gimme Five Paul!”

Before we get to a selection from the list of five word Scripture passages that might be in Paul’s “in box” we should also consider how Charles Haddon Spurgeon went even beyond Paul, perhaps due to “spiritual inflation” in the intervening centuries!

“But the seed, though very small, was a living thing. There is a great difference between a mustard seed and a piece of wax of the same size. Life slumbers in that seed. What life is we cannot tell. Even if you take a microscope you cannot spy it out. It is a mystery, but it is essential to a seed. The Gospel has a something in it not readily discoverable by the philosophical inquirer, if, indeed, he can perceive it at all. Take a maxim of Socrates or of Plato, and inquire whether a nation or a tribe has ever been transformed by it from barbarism to culture. A maxim of a philosopher may have measurably influenced a person in some right direction, but who has ever heard of a someone's whole character being transformed by any observation of Confucius or Socrates? I confess I never have. Human teachings are barren. But within the Gospel, with all its triteness and simplicity, there is a divine life and that life makes all the difference. The human can never rival the divine, for it lacks the life-fire. It is better to preach five words of God's Word than five million words of human wisdom. Human words may seem to be the wiser and the more attractive, but there is no heavenly life in them. Within God's Word, however simple it may be, there dwells an omnipotence like that of God from whose lips it came.”[2]

Note: The five word statements from Scripture selected may not actually be five word statements in  either the Hebrew or Greek originals, nor are they necessarily complete sentences or verses in English language translations from the Hebrew and Greek, including the King James Version  which is the source translation for the statements.  Nevertheless, they were selected for the fundamental truths and span of doctrine that they present.  The current list of 37 examples is not intended to be comprehensive, and may easily be expanded or consolidated.

The 37 selections are categorized under the following four headings:
The Person of Christ — The Redeemer
The Work of Christ (as Prophet, Priest and King) — Redemption Accomplished
The Salvation of Christ — Redemption Applied
The Return of Christ — Redemption Revealed

The advantage of short simple sentences like these is that they are easy to remember. There is little or no danger of our failing to see the forest for the trees! May these words ring in our ears, resonate in our minds, and abide in our memories.

Now for one of the possible selections from Paul’s “in box”:

The five word statement to be considered on this occasion, “Joy shall be in heaven,” falls under the third of these four headings, The Salvation of Christ — Redemption Applied.

Outline:

I. The Issue of Joy in Heaven and the Identification of the Parable
II. The Lack of Joy on Earth and the “Deparabalization” of the Parable
III. The Reality of Joy in Heaven and the Point of the Parable

I. The Issue of Joy in Heaven and the Identification of the Parable

How many parables are here?

What are the three basic elements in this parable?

What are the similarities and differences between the accounts of the lost sheep, coin and son?

How would you title this parable?

II. The Lack of Joy on Earth and the “Deparabalization” of the Parable

The Problem of the Parables[3]

The definition of parable: What is a parable?

Common assumptions and misconceptions about parables — things to be aware of, and in some cases to be avoided

Which Gospel has the most parables? Luke.

What is the longest parable?[4] Luke 15.

Immediate and larger context:

1) the 3 “parables” in Luke 15 (vv. 3-7, 8-10, 11-32),[5]

2) the rest of the “Travel Narrative” of Luke (9:51-19:27),

3) the rest of the Gospel of Luke before and after the “Travel Narrative,”

3) the other parables in the Synoptic Gospels (esp. Mt. 13),

4) the rest of the New Testament, and,

5) the Old Testament.

Subject matters and doctrinal emphases to connect to in these other contexts:

repentance, the love of the Father, sonship, inheritance, adoption, etc.

Specific passages from the Old Testament with connections to the parable:

The two sons? Cp. Cain and Abel, Isaac and Ishmael, and esp. Jacob and Esau (Gen. 27:1-36:8).[6]

The inheritance of the older versus the younger son? Cp. Dt. 21:15:22:4; Jer. 31:18-20.

What about the cultural context? The cultural context of this part of the world in the 1st century A. D.

A definition of culture: What is culture?

 “Culture is part of history because it concerns the creative result of man’s actions. Culture involves the ways, methods, manners, tools, institutions, and literary productions of any people. These reveal how a people lived, what values they stressed, and why they did or did not prosper. Culture involves the totality  which emerges out of the elements that make up everyday life. The terms, “Egyptian Culture,” “Palestinian Culture,” “Greek Culture,” etc., are not abstractions. These terms denote the way of life of these people. Idolatry and sorcery as well as the forms of worship of the living God are all a part of a people and their culture.”
— A. Berkeley Mickelsen, Interpreting the Bible (Grand Rapids: Eerdmans, 1963), pg. 160.

“…cultural literacy, namely, the network of information that all competent readers possess. It is the background information, stored in their minds, that enables them to take up a newspaper and read it with an adequate level of comprehension, getting the point, grasping the implications, relating what they read to the unstated context which alone gives meaning to what they read.”
— E. D. Hirsch, Jr., Cultural Literacy: What Every American Needs To Know (Boston: Houghton Mifflin, 1987), pg. 2.

Examples of cultural illiteracy:

            “I’m mad about my flat!” In the USA? In the UK?

 “Consider the phrase fed up or the word mad. “In Egyptian English, a visitor might say, ‘Thank you. I cannot eat any more cookies. I am fed up.” Someone from the United States or United Kingdom would probably use another word, such as full.

A British person who says, “I’m mad about my flat!” is likely far happier about the apartment than an American who says the same phrase but means “I got stuck with this place.””
— Joan Huyser-Honig, “Kenneth E. Bailey on Jesus through Middle Eastern Eyes” (7 MAY 2008), on the Calvin Institute of Christian Worship at http://worship.calvin.edu/resources/resource-library/kenneth-e-bailey-on-jesus-through-middle-eastern-eyes/ [accessed 22 JUL 2015].

“Look at the bottom of my shoe! I must have stepped on some chewing gum!”
Here?
In Iraq, or a Muslim nation?

“Royal Tulip Al Rasheed Hotel (sometimes spelled Al-Rashid) (Arabic,فندق الرشيد) is an 18-story hotel in Baghdad, Iraq, favored by journalists and media personnel due to its location within Baghdad's Green Zone.”

“It gained worldwide fame during the 1991 Persian Gulf War when CNN conducted their newscasts from the hotel, propelling the network's senior war correspondent Peter Arnett to fame. Between the Persian Gulf War and the 2003 invasion of Iraq, the building was the main housing facility for Western businessmen and diplomats, as well as foreign press.

A tile mosaic depicting U.S. President George H.W. Bush with a look of astonishment on his face was installed on the floor of the lobby after the Persian Gulf War. This was intended to force any visitors to walk over his face to enter the hotel (a serious insult in Arabculture)….After the invasion in 2003, the mosaic was smashed by U.S. soldiers, who left a portrait of Saddam Hussein behind.”
Wikipedia at https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Royal_Tulip_Al_Rasheed_Hotel [accessed 22 JUL 2015].

For examples of cultural illiteracy see: Benjamin J. Stein, “The Cheerful Ignorance of the Young in L.A.,” Washington Post, 3 OCT 1983, pg. A15; cited by E. D. Hirsch, Jr., Cultural Literacy: What Every American Needs To Know (Boston: Houghton Mifflin, 1987), pp. 6-7.

Another example of cultural differences enabling or preventing understanding: “Waltzing Matilda,” in E. D. Hirsch, Jr., Cultural Literacy: What Every American Needs To Know (Boston: Houghton Mifflin, 1987), pg. 17.

In order to get the full impact of the Scriptures we must enter into another culture, and assimilate as much of it as possible. The more culturally literate we are with the Middle East, the Mediterranean, and the Roman Empire of the 1st century A.D. the better we will be able to understand the New Testament documents, and the more we will be able to appreciate their impact on their original recipients. The more culturally literate we are with the previous centuries back to the time of Moses, the greater will be our comprehension of what we encounter in the Old Testament.

Luke 15:11-32 —

11 And he said, A certain man had two sons: 12 And the younger of them said to his father, Father, give me the portion of goods that falleth to me. And he divided unto them his living. 13 And not many days after the younger son gathered all together, and took his journey into a far country, and there wasted his substance with riotous living. 14 And when he had spent all, there arose a mighty famine in that land; and he began to be in want. 15 And he went and joined himself to a citizen of that country; and he sent him into his fields to feed swine. 16 And he would fain have filled his belly with the husks that the swine did eat: and no man gave unto him. 17 And when he came to himself, he said, How many hired servants of my father’s have bread enough and to spare, and I perish with hunger! 18 I will arise and go to my father, and will say unto him, Father, I have sinned against heaven, and before thee, 19 And am no more worthy to be called thy son: make me as one of thy hired servants. 20 And he arose, and came to his father. But when he was yet a great way off, his father saw him, and had compassion, and ran, and fell on his neck, and kissed him. 21 And the son said unto him, Father, I have sinned against heaven, and in thy sight, and am no more worthy to be called thy son. 22 But the father said to his servants, Bring forth the best robe, and put it on him; and put a ring on his hand, and shoes on his feet: 23 And bring hither the fatted calf, and kill it; and let us eat, and be merry: 24 For this my son was dead, and is alive again; he was lost, and is found. And they began to be merry. 25 Now his elder son was in the field: and as he came and drew nigh to the house, he heard musick and dancing. 26 And he called one of the servants, and asked what these things meant. 27 And he said unto him, Thy brother is come; and thy father hath killed the fatted calf, because he hath received him safe and sound. 28 And he was angry, and would not go in: therefore came his father out, and intreated him. 29 And he answering said to his father, Lo, these many years do I serve thee, neither transgressed I at any time thy commandment: and yet thou never gavest me a kid, that I might make merry with my friends: 30 But as soon as this thy son was come, which hath devoured thy living with harlots, thou hast killed for him the fatted calf. 31 And he said unto him, Son, thou art ever with me, and all that I have is thine. 32 It was meet that we should make merry, and be glad: for this thy brother was dead, and is alive again; and was lost, and is found.

For the Muslim emphasis on this parable see especially Kenneth E. Bailey, Jacob and the Prodigal, pg. 15.

Cultural clues — the more we dig, the more we enter into it, the more we learn, the more amazing it is[7]

If you were “a fly on the wall,” and were able to observe the expressions on the faces of Christ’s hearers that day what would you find inexplicable? Why would that be the case?

When they expressed shock, would you have? Why, or why not?

When they shook their heads in dismay and disbelief at what they were hearing, would you be reacting the same way, and for the same reasons? Why, or why not?

What if you heard some of the members of His audience muttering under their breath, or exclaiming out loud, “No! No way! That would never happen! No one would ever do that! Never!” Would you have joined in, and understood why they would respond in this manner?

For the cultural clues concerning the impact of this parable on the original audience see especially Bailey, op. cit. pg. 41.

III. The Reality of Joy in Heaven and the Point of the Parable

“Guess who’s coming to dinner?”

Hebrews 2:5-18

******************************************************************************

…and they caused great joy unto all the brethren. (Acts 15:3)

This is to be contrasted to the response of the Judean false teachers in the First Christian Church of Antioch, and the Pharisees in the First Baptist Church of Jerusalem.  This is the hinge verse in this paragraph, and the mixed responses to this news highlights the element of internal dissension amongst believers over this issue.

Is there a connection in these historical events to the Parable of the Two Sons in Luke 15?  This is commonly referred to as the “Parable of the Prodigal Son”, but when the point of the parable is understood, along with how it is introduced, perhaps it is more accurately referred to as the “Parable of the Two Sons”.  Is there a connection in these historical events in Acts 15 to the meaning of the Parable of the Two Sons in Luke 15?  Are the chapter numbers merely coincidental, or is there a meaningful link between what Christ taught in Luke 15, and what the ascended Christ is doing through His Holy Spirit by His Apostles in Acts 15?

— The Occasion for the Jerusalem Council (The Parable of the Two Ethnicities?), Acts 15:1-5; Sermon preached 22 JUN 2014 by Pastor John T. “Jack” Jeffery at Wayside Gospel Chapel, Greentown, PA.

******************************************************************************

[Sermon preached 26 JUL 2015 by Pastor John T. “Jack” Jeffery at Wayside Gospel Chapel, Greentown, PA.]

Bibliography

Augustine, Quaestiones Evangeliorum, II, 19 (slightly abridged); cited in C. H. Dodd, The Parables of the Kingdom, rev. ed. (New York: Charles Scribner’s Sons, 1961), pp. 1-2; “Augustine's Commentary on the Good Samaritan,” on Sermons.Logos at https://sermons.logos.com/submissions/47795-Augustine-s-Commentary-on-the-Good-Samaritan#content=/submissions/47795 [accessed 21 JUL 2015].

Kenneth E. Bailey, The Cross and the Prodigal (Downers Grove: InterVarsity Press, 2005).

Kenneth E. Bailey, Finding the Lost: Cultural Keys to Luke 15 (St. Louis: Concordia Press, 1992). 

Kenneth E. Bailey, Jacob and the Prodigal: How Jesus Retold Israel’s Story (Downer’s Grove: InterVarsity Press, 2003).

Kenneth E. Bailey, Jesus Through Middle Eastern Eyes: Gospel Studies Informed by Culture (Downers Grove: InterVarsity Press, 2007).

Kenneth E. Bailey, Poet and Peasant: A Literary Cultural Approach to the Parables in Luke (Grand Rapids: Eerdmans, 1976).

Kenneth E. Bailey, Through Peasant Eyes: More Lucan Parables, Their Culture and Style (Grand Rapids: Eerdmans, 1980). 

G. K. Beale, and D. A. Carson, Commentary on the New Testament use of the Old Testament (Grand Rapids: Baker Academic, 2007), pp. 341–343.

D. A. Carson, The Difficult Doctrine of the Love of God (Wheaton: Crossway, 2000), pg. 12; also in D. A. Carson, “On Distorting the Love of God,” Bibliotheca Sacra 156:621 (Jan 1999), pp. 3-12.[8]

C. H. Dodd, The Parables of the Kingdom, rev. ed. (New York: Charles Scribner’s Sons, 1961), pp. 91-93.

J. Duncan M. Derrett, Law in the New Testament (London: Darton, Longman & Todd, 1970), pp. 100-125, s.v. “The Parable of the Prodigal Son.”[9]

Gordon D. Fee and Douglas Stuart, How To Read The Bible For All Its Worth: A Guide to Understanding the Bible, 4th ed. (Grand Rapids: Academie Books, 1982, 1993, 2003, 2014), pp. 154-167.

Sinclair Ferguson, From the Mouth of God (Carlisle, PA: Banner of Truth, 2014), pp. 113-120.

Ada R. Habershon, The Study of the Parables, 6th ed. (London: Pickering & Inglis, n.d.).

E. D. Hirsch, Jr., Cultural Literacy: What Every American Needs To Know (Boston: Houghton Mifflin, 1987), pp. 2, 6-7, 17.

Joachim Jeremias, The Parables of Jesus, 2nd rev. ed. (New York: Charles Scribner’s Sons, 1954. 1963, 1972; from Die Gleichnisse Jesu, 8th ed., Gottingen: Vandenhoeck and Ruprecht, 1970), pp. 128-136.

Timothy Keller, “The Fellowship of Grace Series” (related to his book The Prodigal God), on gospel in life at http://www.gospelinlife.com/sermons/the-fellowship-of-grace.html [accessed 27 JUL 2015]; seven sermons on Luke 15 preached from 28 SEP 2008 to 9 NOV 2008. See especially Keller’s final sermon, “The True Older Brother.”[10]

Timothy Keller, The Prodigal God: Recovering the Heart of the Christian Faith (New York: Dutton, 2008).

I. Howard Marshall, and R. V. G. Tasker, “Parable,” in New Bible Dictionary, 3rd ed., eds. A. R. Millard, J. I. Packer, D. J. Wiseman, and D. R. W. Wood (Downers Grove, IL: InterVarsity, 1996), pp. 867–869.

Robert L. Plummer, 40 Questions about Interpreting the Bible, series ed. Benjamin L. Merkle (Grand Rapids: Kregel Academic & Professional, 2011), pp. 265-277.

J. C. Ryle, Expository Thoughts on the Gospels, 4 vols., Vol. 2: Luke 11-24 (Grand Rapids: Baker Book House, n.d.; 1990 reprint of 1856 original), pp. 180-195; s.v. Luke 15:11-32; on Grace Gems at http://gracegems.org/Ryle/l15.htm [accessed 21 JUL 2015].

G. H. Schodde, “Parable,” in The International Standard Bible Encyclopedia: 1915 edition, ed. J. Edwin Orr (Albany, OR: Ages Software, 1999); on International Standard Bible Encyclopedia Online at http://www.internationalstandardbible.com/P/parable.html [accessed 11 SEP 2015].

John W. Sider, Interpreting the Parables: A Hermeneutical Guide to Their Meaning (Grand Rapids: Zondervan, 1995).

Klyne R. Snodgrass, “Parable,” in Walter A. Elwell, and B. J. Beitzel, Baker Encyclopedia of the Bible (Grand Rapids: Baker, 1988), pp. 1606-1614.

R. C. Sproul, Knowing Scripture, 2nd ed. (Downers Grove, IL: InterVarsity Press, 1977, 2009), pp. 94-97.

Benjamin J. Stein, “The Cheerful Ignorance of the Young in L.A.,” Washington Post, 3 OCT 1983, pg. A15.

R. C. Trench, Notes on the Parables of Our Lord (London: Society for Promoting Christian Knowledge, 1910), 99. 392-428.

Warren W. Wiersbe, Meet Yourself in the Parables (Wheaton: Victor, 1983).



End Notes:

[1] 1 Corinthians 14:19.

[2] Charles H. Spurgeon, “The Mustard Seed: A Sermon for the Sabbath-School Teacher” (Lk. 13:18-19), Sermon No. 2110, delivered 20 OCT 1889, at the Metropolitan Tabernacle, Newington, U.K.; in Metropolitan Tabernacle Pulpit, Vol. 35 (1889), pp. 565ff.; in Charles H. Spurgeon, The Parables of Our Lord (Grand Rapids: Baker Book House, 2003), pg. 707; and on The Spurgeon Archive at http://www.spurgeon.org/sermons/2110.htm [accessed 23 DEC 2014].

[3] “The interpretation of parables has been a happy hunting ground for misunderstandings….parables can either illumine or blind us.” Sinclair Ferguson, From the Mouth of God (Carlisle, PA: Banner of Truth, 2014), pg. 113.

[4] “Lk xv.11-32, an elaborate, circumstantial, in fact the longest, parable….” J. Duncan M. Derrett, Law in the New Testament (London: Darton, Longman & Todd, 1970), pg. 100, s.v. “The Parable of the Prodigal Son.” This chapter, pp. 100-125, was originally published as an article: J. Duncan M. Derrett, “Law in the New Testament: The Parable of the Prodigal Son,” New Testament Studies 14 (1967), pp. 56-74.

[5] “Luke chapter 15 as a whole is a triptych — a picture painted on three panels.” Ferguson, op. cit., pg. 118.

[6] On this see especially Kenneth E. Bailey, Jacob and the Prodigal: How Jesus Retold Israel’s Story (Downer’s Grove, IL: InterVarsity Press, 2003). Bailey states, “In my personal study, a list of fifty-one points of comparison and contrast have gradually emerged.” Op. cit., pg 14. He credits a footnote in N. T. Wright, Jesus and the Victory of God: Christian Origins and the Question of God, Vol. 2 (Minneapolis: Fortress, 1996), pg. 127, note 10, with alerting him to the possibilities in this connection. This was in connection with Gen. 33:4.

[7] “We can take it as a general rule of thumb that parables paint pictures of something unexpected in life which — often with marvelous attention to literary details that enhance the emotional power of the narrative — teach us how God’s kingdom works. They bring us into a kingdom where Samaritans help Jews, where prodigal sons are welcomed home, and much else happens to overturn our expectations.” Ferguson, op. cit., pg. 117.

[8] Originally presented as The W. H. Griffith Thomas Lectures (FEB 1998), Dallas Theological Seminary, Dallas, TX.

[9] This chapter was originally published as an article: J. Duncan M. Derrett, “Law in the New Testament: The Parable of the Prodigal Son,” New Testament Studies 14 (1967), pp. 56-74.

[10] I am indebted to a fellow member of Wayside Gospel Chapel, Mary Ellen Bradley, for bringing Keller’s book and sermon series on this subject to my attention. I was not aware of either prior to preaching this sermon, but believe that we are on the “same wavelength.” Keller also credited Kenneth E. Bailey's work. I have included several of them in the bibliography.

No comments: