Verse of the Day

Wednesday, May 6, 2015

The Study of the Scriptures - Session 7: Wednesday, 29 APR 2015 at Faith Baptist Fellowship Church, Lake Ariel, PA

The Study of the Scriptures
Session 7, Wednesday 29 APR 2015
Faith Baptist Fellowship Church
Lake Ariel, PA

Note: There was no audio recording of this session.

Review Sessions 1-6[1]

The Means God Uses: The Scriptures, the Holy Spirit, and the Church

“Search the scriptures; for in them ye think ye have eternal life: and they are they which testify of me.” (John 5:39)

1. Placing trust in God: The ability of God and the sufficiency of the Scriptures — Coming to the Scriptures with Faith

2. Putting man in his place: The inability of fallen man and an understanding of the responses of the creature to the revelation of God — Coming to the Scriptures with Humility

3. The Unity of the Word of God: the First, Progressive, and Full Mention Principles of Interpretation — Coming to the Scriptures with Hope

4. The Diversity of the Contexts within the Canon of Scripture — Coming to the Scriptures with Respect

5. The Humiliation of Incarnational Hermeneutics — Coming to the Scriptures with Caution

6. Putting the Scriptures in their Place: The Historical Perspective in Bible Study — Coming to the Scriptures with Perspective

The Beatitudes (Mt. 5:3-12),
and the Perfect Righteousness Demanded
by the Sermon on the Mount (Mt. 5-7)[2] for Blessing

Perhaps there will be no disagreement if I conclude that the four most familiar passages in the Bible — besides individual verses — are the Ten Commandments (Exodus 20:1-17; Deuteronomy 5:6-21), Psalm 23, the Beatitudes (Matthew 5:3-12), and the “Lord’s” Prayer (Matthew 6:9-13; Luke 11:2-4).

Previously we have considered the value for Bible study of the story of “The Student, the Fish, and Agassiz.” In that case the lesson had to do with looking, i.e., the value of persevering in intense, prolonged scrutiny and detailed examination. Let us now consider another, much shorter, and much older tale that may serve as an example to bear in mind on another aspect of Bible study.

A slave who lived at the same time as the Babylonian Captivity of Judea wrote many brief stories that have stood the test of time. Here is one of them:

When first the Fox saw the Lion he was terribly frightened, and ran away and hid himself in the wood. Next time however he came near the King of Beasts he stopped at a safe distance and watched him pass by. The third time they came near one another the Fox went straight up to the Lion and passed the time of day with him, asking him how his family were, and when he should have the pleasure of seeing him again; then turning his tail, he parted from the Lion without much ceremony.

These tales are traditionally followed by phrases summarizing the moral. In this case the moral of the story is: “Familiarity breeds contempt.”[3]

We need to beware that this does not happen in our study of the Scriptures, especially in the more familiar passages! Let us venture forth with one such example.

I. The blessedness presented in the Beatitudes[4] is a heavenly inheritance

The present tenses in Matthew 5:3 and 10 may seem to indicate immediate blessing as opposed to the future tenses in verses 4-9, but such a conclusion would be premature when comparison is made to verses 11-12.  The blessing of the persecuted, i.e., the possession of the kingdom of heaven, referred to in verse 10 in the present tense is then spoken of in verse 12 as being  a great reward "in heaven".  This understanding should then be connected to verse 3 as well.  The inheritance is sure to the Blessed Man now, but it is a heavenly blessing that is to be inherited.[5]

Verse
Characteristic -
Blessed are:[6]
Blessing -
for theirs is/they shall be:
3
the poor in spirit
the kingdom of heaven
4
they that mourn
be comforted
5
the meek
inherit the earth
6
they which do hunger and thirst after righteousness
be filled
7
the merciful
obtain mercy
8
the pure in heart
see God
9
the peacemakers
be called the children of God
10-12
they which are persecuted for righteousness' sake….
ye, when men shall revile you, and persecute you, and shall say all manner of evil against you falsely, for my sake
the kingdom of heaven….
for great is your reward in heaven

II. The blessedness taught in the Beatitudes is also a consolidated or cumulative inheritance.

In other words, none of the Beatitudes may be isolated from another.  It is not as if it is sufficient to be meek, without also being poor in spirit, or a peacemaker, etc.  These should all be seen as different facets of the same righteousness, as different ways of looking at the same thing.  The blessing pronounced by Christ in the Beatitudes is for the One who does all of these things.  It is as if He has these attributes as colors on a palette and is applying them one at a time to a canvas painting a finished picture of the Blessed Man, who is the Heir of the Kingdom.  The blessings that correspond to these attributes must be thought of in the same way.  They may not be disconnected or divided.  The blessings are all connected inextricably, and stand together necessarily.[7]

Comparison should be made between the Beatitudes and the Blessed Man of Psalm 1, while observing the connection between Psalm 1 and Psalm 2! 

The connection of this passage in the Gospels to the Blessed Man of Ephesian 1:3-14 should also be considered. The blessings of Christians are in Christ by virtue of union with Him.  He is the Blessed Man, and we are blessed in Him.  Any reception of the blessings mentioned in the Beatitudes comes solely by virtue of His imputed righteousness and indwelling Spirit (Rom. 8:1-4, 16-17, 32). It is only in Christ that this perfect righteousness and blessed inheritance is assured to anyone (2 Cor. 5:17-21).

______________________________________________________________________________

III. The blessedness revealed by Christ in the Sermon on the Mount requires more than just a partial righteousness

Nothing less than the perfect righteousness of God Himself will do.  See for example just a few statements following the end of the Beatitudes: “For I say unto you, That except your righteousness shall exceed the righteousness of the scribes and Pharisees, ye shall in no case enter into the kingdom of heaven.” (Mt. 5:20) Also, this first chapter of the Sermon on the Mount concludes with, “Be ye therefore perfect, even as your Father which is in heaven is perfect.” (Mt. 5:48)

From the blessings of the Beatitudes in Mt. 5:3-12 to the fall of the house built on the sand in Mt. 7:16-27 if we are not astonished at Christ's doctrine and the authority with which He taught it we have not rightly grasped this Sermon. His original hearers did not come away saying, “How wonderful! He’s OK, I’m OK, and that’s OK!” Nor did they conclude, “I can do that! Let’s git ‘er done!” Quite literally, they were blown away by what they heard, knew that they had never heard anything like it before, and quite frankly did not know quite what to do with what they had heard. Speechless astonishment would be a more accurate description of their response: And it came to pass, when Jesus had ended these sayings, the people were astonished at his doctrine: For he taught them as one having authority, and not as the scribes. (Mt. 7:28-29) If we do not respond in a similar fashion repeated rereadings are recommended!

The essence of what we should take away from this sermon is explicitly taught by Christ in the following statements, two of which have already been considered:

"For I say unto you, That except your righteousness shall exceed the righteousness of the scribes and Pharisees, ye shall in no case enter into the kingdom of heaven." (Mt. 5:20)

"Be ye therefore perfect, even as your Father which is in heaven is perfect." (Mt. 5:48)

"Enter ye in at the strait gate: for wide is the gate, and broad is the way, that leadeth to destruction, and many there be which go in thereat: Because strait is the gate, and narrow is the way, which leadeth unto life, and few there be that find it." (Mt. 7:13-14)

"Not every one that saith unto me, Lord, Lord, shall enter into the kingdom of heaven; but he that doeth the will of my Father which is in heaven. Many will say to me in that day, Lord, Lord, have we not prophesied in thy name? and in thy name have cast out devils? and in thy name done many wonderful works? And then will I profess unto them, I never knew you: depart from me, ye that work iniquity." (Mt. 7:21-23)

Christ's message in the Sermon on the Mount should humble the pride of man in the dust, and demonstrate our absolute need for the perfect righteousness of the Blessed Man, the Lord Jesus Christ received by imputation alone.[8]

“Much misunderstanding and frustration are caused if we regard the precepts contained in this section as rules which can be obeyed literally by anybody, under any circumstances, by the exercise of the human will, in the same way that the laws of an earthly state can be complied with by any of its citizens.”[9]

“Without the cross the Sermon on the Mount would be an intolerable burden; with the cross it becomes the guide to a way of life. In the Sermon on the Mount Jesus held up an unattainable ideal, he has revealed the depths of human guilt, he has made demands far too lofty for human strength. But thank God, he has revealed guilt only to wash it away, and with his demands he has given strength to fulfill them. It is a sadly superficial view of the sermon on the mount which substitutes it for the story of the cross. A deeper understanding of it leads straight to Calvary.”[10]

______________________________________________________________________________

IV. The blessedness delineated in the Beatitudes is nothing less than a covenantal blessedness which any 1st century Jewish hearer would not fail to miss.

There are five major discourses in Matthew: chapters 5-7, 10, 13, 18, and 23-25 — all marked off by similar concluding phrases: “And it came to pass, when Jesus had ended these sayings” (Mt. 7:28; 11:1; 13:53; 19:1; and 26:1)[11]

·         And it came to pass, when Jesus had ended these sayings (Mt. 7:28)
·         And it came to pass, when Jesus had made an end of commanding his twelve disciples (Mt. 11:1)
·         And it came to pass, that when Jesus had finished these parables (Mt. 13:53)
·         And it came to pass, that when Jesus had finished these sayings (Mt. 19:1)
·         And it came to pass, when Jesus had finished all these sayings (Mt. 26:1)

The sermon that Christ begins in Matthew 5:3-12 with the Beatitudes would immediately have been connected by His hearers to the covenantal blessings pronounced on Mount Gerizim (Dt. 11:26-30; 27:12; 28:1-14; Josh. 8:33-34), and then contrasted with the covenantal curses pronounced on Mount Ebal (Dt. 11:26-30; 27:13-26; 28:15-68; Josh. 8:30-34). Any who failed to understand the significance of what transpired in Moses’ day on the two mountains are now confronted by the New Covenant Lord and Lawgiver’s words whose authority is unmistakable (Mt. 7:28-29). While yet “under the Law” (Gal. 4:4), Christ, the Seed of Abraham, here on this mount expounds the impossibility of obtaining the blessing promised to Abraham by the Law (Gal. 3:8-18, 21).

Some have disputed the connection between the Beatitudes in Matthew, and the blessings on Mount Gerizim in Deuteronomy. One who has done so, after presenting a very convincing case for interpreting the Beatitudes against the backdrop of Deuteronomy, is Charles Quarles, in a footnote in The Sermon on the Mount: Restoring Christ’s Message to the Modern Church:[12]

“Though a possible connection with Deuteronomy 28 cannot be completely ruled out, this is doubtful. Deuteronomy 28 (LXX) uses forms of εὐλογέω in the pronouncements. Matthew uses μακάριος (blessed) rather than a form of εὐλογέω. Matthew had no reason to change verbs if he desired to point to a connection with Deuteronomy 28.”

This etymological argument does nothing to disprove the connection especially if the New, Greater Moses intentionally used this synonym to accentuate the difference between His proclamation and that on the earlier mountain, Gerizim. Dr. Carson is helpful here, even suggesting a possible reason in the context the different synonym being used in Matthew:

Eulogētos does not occur in Matthew; but the cognate verb appears five time (14:19; 21:9; 23:39; 25:34; 26:26), in one of which it applies to man (25:34), not God or Christ. Attempts to make makarios mean “happy” and eulogētos “blessed” (Broadus) are therefore futile; though both appear many times, both can apply to either God or man. It is difficult not to conclude that their common factor is approval: man “blesses” God, approving and praising him; God “blesses” man, approving him in grascious condescension. Applied to man the OT words are certainly synonymous (cf. Theologisches Handwӧrterbuch zum Alten Testament, 1:356).
            As for “happy” (TEV), it will not do for the Beatitudes, having been devalued in modern usage. The Greek “describes a state not of inner feeling on the part of those to whom it is applied, but of blessedness from an ideal point of view in the judgment of others” (Allen). In the eschatological setting of Matthew, “blessed” can only promised eschatological blessing (cf. DNTT, 1:216-17; TDNT, 4367-70); and each particular blessing is specified in the second clause of each beatitude.”[13]

This was not the only one of the five major discourses in Matthew recorded as occurring on a mountain. Later on another mountain, following the pronouncement of the woes on the scribes and Pharisees in Jerusalem, he would prophesy the coming of the curses on the nation (Mt. 23-25).[14] Therefore, the first and the final discourses of the five in Matthew present an instructive correspondence to Mount Gerizim and Mount Ebal: The Sermon on the Mount (Mt. 5-7), and the Olivet Discourse (Mt. 23-25).

In between the “Gerizim” and “Ebal” of Matthew He would stand on a third mountain, and reveal to Peter, James, and John what no one else had ever seen as He was transfigured and endorsed as the Son, the sole voice they should be paying attention to (Mt. 17). As such His blessings and cursings differ from those uttered through Moses both in degree and in kind. It is this reality that is fundamental for comprehending the point of two of the warning passages in Hebrews.

Hebrews 10:26-31 — 26 For if we sin wilfully after that we have received the knowledge of the truth, there remaineth no more sacrifice for sins, 27 But a certain fearful looking for of judgment and fiery indignation, which shall devour the adversaries. 28 He that despised Moses' law died without mercy under two or three witnesses: 29 Of how much sorer punishment, suppose ye, shall he be thought worthy, who hath trodden under foot the Son of God, and hath counted the blood of the covenant, wherewith he was sanctified, an unholy thing, and hath done despite unto the Spirit of grace? 30 For we know him that hath said, Vengeance belongeth unto me, I will recompense, saith the Lord. And again, The Lord shall judge his people. 31 It is a fearful thing to fall into the hands of the living God.

Hebrews 12:18-29 — 18 For ye are not come unto the mount that might be touched, and that burned with fire, nor unto blackness, and darkness, and tempest, 19 And the sound of a trumpet, and the voice of words; which voice they that heard intreated that the word should not be spoken to them any more: 20 (For they could not endure that which was commanded, And if so much as a beast touch the mountain, it shall be stoned, or thrust through with a dart: 21 And so terrible was the sight, that Moses said, I exceedingly fear and quake:) 22 But ye are come unto mount Sion, and unto the city of the living God, the heavenly Jerusalem, and to an innumerable company of angels, 23 To the general assembly and church of the firstborn, which are written in heaven, and to God the Judge of all, and to the spirits of just men made perfect, 24 And to Jesus the mediator of the new covenant, and to the blood of sprinkling, that speaketh better things than that of Abel. 25 See that ye refuse not him that speaketh. For if they escaped not who refused him that spake on earth, much more shall not we escape, if we turn away from him that speaketh from heaven: 26 Whose voice then shook the earth: but now he hath promised, saying, Yet once more I shake not the earth only, but also heaven. 27 And this word, Yet once more, signifieth the removing of those things that are shaken, as of things that are made, that those things which cannot be shaken may remain. 28 Wherefore we receiving a kingdom which cannot be moved, let us have grace, whereby we may serve God acceptably with reverence and godly fear: 29 For our God is a consuming fire.

Those who really understand and respond to the Beatitudes as Christ intended us to may have the following said of them, or engraved on their tombstones:

“Of this blest man,
Let this just praise be given:
Heaven was in him
Before he was in heaven.”[15]

______________________________________________________________________________

Sola Gratia, Sola Fide, Solus Christus, Soli Deo Gloria,

John T. “Jack” Jeffery
Pastor, Wayside Gospel Chapel
Greentown, PA

13 MAR 2012

Revised:

9 JUL 2014
2 SEP 2014
21 APR 2015
27 APR 2015
29 APR 2015

Appendix A: Sources

Nick Batzig, "It All Leads Straight To The Cross" (8 JUL 2014), on Christward Collective at  http://www.christwardcollective.org/christward/it-all-leads-straight-to-the-cross [accessed 9 JUL 2014].

D. A. Carson, Matthew, Chapters 1 Through 12, in The Expositor’s Bible Commentary with The New International Version, eds. Frank E. Gaebelein, J. D. Douglas, and Richard P. Polcyn (Grand Rapids: Zondervan Publishing House, 1995).

Sinclair B. Ferguson, Kingdom Living in a Fallen World: Living Out the Sermon on the Mount (Colorado Springs, CO: NavPress, 1986).

D. Martyn Lloyd-Jones, Studies in the Sermon on the Mount, one vol. ed. (Grand Rapids: Wm. B. Eerdmans Publishing Co., 1959, 1960, 1971).

Charles Quarles, The Sermon on the Mount: Restoring Christ’s Message to the Modern Church, NAC Studies in Bible & Theology, series ed. E. Ray Clendenen (Nashville: B&H Publishing Group, 2011), pp. 15-76.

R. V. G. Tasker, The Gospel According to St. Matthew: An Introduction and Commentary, in The Tyndale New Testament Commentaries, gen. ed. R. V. G. Tasker (Grand Rapids: Wm. B. Eerdmans Publishing Co., 1961).

Geerhardus Vos, “Hungering and Thirsting after Righteousness” (Mt. 5:6), Grace and Glory: Sermons Preached in the Chapel of Princeton Theological Seminary (Vestavia Hills, AL: Solid Ground Christian Books, n.d.; reprint of 1922 ed. by The Reformed Press, Grand Rapids), pp. 37-57; available on Google Books at http://books.google.com/books?id=Wm5GAAAAYAAJ&printsec=frontcover#v=onepage&q&f=false [accessed 9 JUL 2014]. Note: This sermon is on pp. 2-16 of the 1903 ed.

Geerhardus Vos, “The Gracious Provision” (1 Cor. 5:7), Grace and Glory (n.p., 1903), pp. 142-148; available as a free digital download on good reads at  http://www.goodreads.com/book/show/567084.Grace_and_Glory [accessed 9 JUL 2014].


Appendix B: Basic Bible Study Materials — A Suggested Bibliography (with links to Amazon)

This is the book that I recommend as collateral reading for the "Scripture Study Seminar":

Sinclair Ferguson, From the Mouth of God (Carlisle, PA: Banner of Truth, 2014); paperback (no Kindle available at this time) for $10.59 on Amazon at http://www.amazon.com/Mouth-God-Sinclair-B-Ferguson/dp/1848712421/ [accessed 18 JAN 2015].


1. In addition to Sinclair Ferguson's work that I am recommending as collateral reading the following five recent works on the subject may be the most helpful:

J. Scott Duvall, and J. Daniel Hays, Journey into God's Word: Your Guide to Understanding and Applying the Bible (Grand Rapids: Zondervan, 2008);

Gordon D. Fee and Douglas Stuart, How To Read The Bible For All Its Worth: A Guide to Understanding the Bible, 4th ed. (Grand Rapids: Academie Books, 1982, 1993, 2003, 2014); 

Peter Krol, Knowable Word: Helping Ordinary People Learn to Study the Bible (Minneapolis: Cruciform Press, 2014);

Grant Osborne, The Hermeneutical Spiral: A Comprehensive Introduction to Biblical Interpretation, 2nd ed. (Downers Grove, IL: InterVarsity Press, 1991, 2006);

R. C. Sproul, Knowing Scripture, 2nd ed. (Downers Grove, IL: InterVarsity Press, 1977, 2009);


2. Here are five recommended older works whose value does not fade!

James M. Gray, How to Master the English Bible: An Experience, a Method, a Result, an Illustration (London: Oliphant Anderson & Ferrier, 1907);
in public domain, available online or as a free downloadable digital file (PDF or ePub) on Google Books at http://books.google.com/books?id=AOUOAAAAQAAJ&printsec=frontcover#v=onepage&q&f=false [accessed 18 FEB 2012].

J. Edwin Hartill, Principles of Biblical Hermeneutics (Grand Rapids: Zondervan Publishing House, 1947);
available online or as a free PDF file download (60 mb) on Seminario LAMB at  http://seminariolamb.com/biblioteca/lib/lib-biblical%20analysis/Principles%20of%20Biblical%20Hermeneutics%20-%20J%20Edwin%20Hartill.pdf [accessed 9 MAR 2014];
print editions available on Amazon at 
[accessed 18 JAN 2015].

Arthur T. Pierson, The Bible and Spiritual Criticism: Being the Second Series of Exeter Hall Lectures on the Bible Delivered in London, England in the Months of February, March and April, 1904 (Minneapolis: Bethany Fellowship, Inc., n.d.; 1970 reprint of 1905 original by The Baker and Taylor Co., New York);

Robert A. Traina, Methodical Bible Study: A New Approach to Hermeneutics (Wilmore, KY: self-published, 1952; Grand Rapids: Zondervan, 1980); 

Oletta Wald, The New Joy of Discovery in Bible Study, rev. ed. (Minneapolis: Augsburg Fortress, 2002);
Note: This newly revised edition is also available in Kindle.


Compiled by:

John T. “Jack” Jeffery
Pastor, Wayside Gospel Chapel
Greentown, PA





End Notes:

[1] The notes from the previous sessions have been posted to the Wayside Gospel Chapel blog at  http://waysidegospelchapel.blogspot.com/search/label/Scripture%20Study%20Seminar.

[2] The highest recommendation should be reserved for the following work on this passage: D. Martyn Lloyd-Jones, Studies in the Sermon on the Mount, one vol. ed. (Grand Rapids: Wm. B. Eerdmans Publishing Co., 1959, 1960, 1971).

[3] “Aesop (c. 620-564 B.C.) 
       The moral of “The Fox and the Lion” story in Aesop’s Fables 
       In traditional English translations of Aesop’s Fables, there’s a phrase at the end of each brief tale that summarizes “the moral of the story.” The origin of the proverbial saying “Familiarity breeds contempt” is widely credited to the traditional translation of Aesop’s fable “The Fox and the Lion,” which reads: 
        When first the Fox saw the Lion he was terribly frightened, and ran away and hid himself in the wood. Next time however he came near the King of Beasts he stopped at a safe distance and watched him pass by. The third time they came near one another the Fox went straight up to the Lion and passed the time of day with him, asking him how his family were, and when he should have the pleasure of seeing him again; then turning his tail, he parted from the Lion without much ceremony. 
       “Familiarity Breeds Contempt”
       In traditional English translations of Aesop’s Fables, there’s a phrase at the end of each brief tale that summarizes “the moral of the story.” The origin of the proverbial saying “Familiarity breeds contempt” is widely credited to the traditional translation of Aesop’s fable “The Fox and the Lion,” which reads:          When first the Fox saw the Lion he was terribly frightened, and ran away and hid himself in the wood. Next time however he came near the King of Beasts he stopped at a safe distance and watched him pass by. The third time they came near one another the Fox went straight up to the Lion and passed the time of day with him, asking him how his family were, and when he should have the pleasure of seeing him again; then turning his tail, he parted from the Lion without much ceremony.        “Familiarity Breeds Contempt”

Another, much later source for this moralism, is the following: “Parit enim conversatio contemptum; raritas conciliat admirationem,” Translation: “Familiarity breeds contempt, while rarity wins admiration.” Variant translation: “Familiarity breeds contempt, but concealment excites interest.” De Deo Socratis (On the God of Socrates), ch. 4; pg. 355.  Lucius Apuleius (c. 125 – c. 180), Metamorphoses, in The Works of Apuleius (London: Bohn’s Classical Library, 1853); on Wikipedia at http://en.wikiquote.org/wiki/Apuleius [accessed 28 APR 2015].

[4] “…(Lat. beatus, “blessed”), otherwise called macarisms (from Gr. makarios, “blessed”)…” D. A. Carson, Matthew, Chapters 1 Through 12, in The Expositor’s Bible Commentary with The New International Version, eds. Frank E. Gaebelein, J. D. Douglas, and Richard P. Polcyn (Grand Rapids: Zondervan Publishing House, 1995), pg. 130.

[5] Carson, op. cit., pg. 131.

[6] The only time the “to be” verb is expressed rather than understood in the first half of these verses is in verse 11.

[7] On this point, see, for examples: R. V. G. Tasker, The Gospel According to St. Matthew: An Introduction and Commentary, in The Tyndale New Testament Commentaries, gen. ed. R. V. G. Tasker (Grand Rapids: Wm. B. Eerdmans Publishing Co., 1961), pg. 61, “…no single one of them can in fact exist in isolation from the others…”; Sinclair B. Ferguson, Kingdom Living in a Fallen World: Living Out the Sermon on the Mount (Colorado Springs, CO: NavPress, 1986), pg. 67, “They belong together, as parts of a whole.” Lloyd-Jones, op. cit., pg. 32, “Each one of these in a sense demands the others. It is impossible truly to manifest one of these graces, and to conform to the blessing that is pronounced upon it, without at the same time inevitably showing the others also. The Beatitudes are a complete whole and you cannot divide them…” Cp. also Lloyd-Jones, op. cit., pp. 32-34.

[8] Most of this point was originally posted to Facebook 2 SEP 2014, on the “Calvinist Dispensationalists, Unite!” group page.

[9] Tasker, op. cit., pg. 60. Also on this see especially Lloyd Jones, op. cit., pp. 28-41.

[10] J. Gresham Machen, The New Testament: An Introduction to its Literature and History (Carlisle, PA: Banner of Truth Trust), pg. 196-197; cited by Nicholas T. Batzig, “The Sermon on the Mount and the Cross of Christ” (6 FEB 2008); on Feeding On Christ at http://feedingonchrist.com/the-sermon-on-the-mount-and-the-cross-of-christ/ [accessed 22 APR 2015] — “Years ago I came across a great quote out of J. Gresham Machen’s The New Testament: An Introduction to its Literature and History. While explaining how to understand the Sermon on the Mount (Matt. 5-7) in light of the larger context of the Gospels, Machen wrote:…” 

[11] Sinclair B. Ferguson, Kingdom Living in a Fallen World: Living Out the Sermon on the Mount (Colorado Springs, CO: NavPress, 1986), pg. 16.

[12] NAC Studies in Bible & Theology, series ed. E. Ray Clendenen (Nashville: B&H Publishing Group, 2011), pp. 35-40, s.v. Chapter 5, and especially footnote 10. He references a chapter he contributed to another work: Charles Quarles, “The Blessings of the New Moses: The Theological Purpose of the Matthean Beatitudes.”In Jesus as Israel’s Messiah: Engaging the Work of N. Thomas Wright, eds. Robert L. Webb and Mark Allan Powell, Library of New Testament Studies 371 (London: T. & T. Clark International, 2011).This book is out of print, and copies are only available for astronomical prices ($100+), and usually only from foreign vendors (e.g., England and Australia). Murphy Memorial Library at Summit University does not have a copy.

[13] D. A. Carson, op. cit., pg. 131.

[14] Sadly, D. A. Carson seems to have missed this connection in his unqualified,  “…Matthew mentions no woes…” Carson, op. cit., pg. 130. To be fair, he is only referring to the immediate context of Matthew 5, here seen in contrast to Luke 6 where four beatitudes are followed by four woes. To be sure, Matthew mentions no woes here, as Luke does, but woes there are to follow, both in Matthew (ch. 23), and in Luke (ch. 11).

[15] Izaak Walton, about Richard Sibbes, “…in the flyleaf of his copy of Richard Sibbes, The Returning Backslider.” Cited by Ferguson, op. cit., pg. 68, referencing A. B. Grosart, Memoir of Richard Sibbes, vol. I in The Works of Richard Sibbes (Edinburgh: Banner of Truth Trust, 1973), page xx.” Ferguson, op. cit., pg. 79, note 1. Walton is celebrated as the author of the fly fishing classic, The Compleat Angler.

No comments: